• Campaign News
    • Campaign News
    • Events
  • About
    • About
    • Local Groups
    • National Caucuses
    • Endorsing Organizations
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
    • Ecology Network
    • Initial Signatories
  • We the People Amendment
    • We the People Amendment
    • Other Amendments
    • Resolutions in Support
  • Get Involved
    • Get Involved
    • Volunteer
    • Share the Petition
    • Action Campaigns
    • Take Action Toolkit
  • Learn More
    • Learn More
    • Corporate Constitutional Rights Resources
    • Timeline of Personhood Rights
    • Legalize Democracy Intro Video
    • Movement Education Program 3.0
    • Examples of Corporate Rule
    • REAL Democracy History Calendar
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Spread the Word
  • Online Store
  • En Español
  • Search
Facebook Twitter Or sign in with email Don't have an account? Register now

Pages tagged "Lobbying"


The "We the People" Amendment and Unintended Consequences

Posted on Political Organizing Kit by Keyan Bliss · March 13, 2020 3:45 PM

Every reform effort or legislation can be questioned by raising the specter of “unintended consequences.”  So, too, House Joint Resolution 48. But it only eliminates corporate constitutional rights (CCRs) that We The People never granted to corporations.  Below are some of the alleged unintended consequences of the We The People Amendment and Move to Amend’s responses.

1. "Eliminating CCRs would cause huge financial disruption of the American economy."

Corporations did not have or need CCRs to become the most powerful and dominant economic institutions in the 1800’s. Their size and influence have only grown since then. If eliminating CCRs caused any economic angst, Congress and/or the States can enact appropriate legislation to address specific problems. Financial disruption does not appear to be an issue.

2. "Eliminating CCRs would subject corporations to government overreach."

Per state statute, corporations already have the right to sue in a court of law to protect their interests. Existing federal and state statutes already protect corporations from unlawful searches and seizures, e.g., California Penal Code, Title 12, Chapter 3 (search warrants); United States Code, Title 18, Chapters 109, 205 (searches and seizures). Under HJR 48 corporate shareholders, officers, and employees, as well as association members, all retain their rights as individuals, so no legitimate rights will be lost.

3. "Eliminating CCRs would result in corporations being forced to disclose proprietary Information."

Trade secrets are protected by both federal and state laws. The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and Uniform Trade Secrets Act, which most states have passed. The former provides protections of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, and engineering related trade secrets if the owner has taken basic measures to keep such information secret.

4. "Eliminating CCRs would jeopardize non-profit corporations and associations." 

Each of the rights the Supreme Court has created for corporations (Equal Protection & Due Process [14th Amend.], No surprise inspections/searches [4th Amend.], Due Process and compensation for government takings [5th Amend.] Political and commercial speech & “right not to speak [1st Amend.], Jury trial in criminal case [6th Amend.], Freedom from double jeopardy [5th Amend.], and Jury trial in civil case [7th Amend.] could be conferred statutorily on for-profit or non-profit corporations by Congress or the States.

5. "Eliminating CCRs would make non-profits such as Planned Parenthood subject to unreasonable searches and seizures."

Even absent statutory protections the U.S. Supreme Court has already recognized the right of corporations to represent their members' constitutional rights under appropriate circumstances. In NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958) the Alabama attorney general obtained an injunction against the Alabama branch of the NAACP for violating that state's incorporation laws and sought information including the names and addresses of its members. The NAACP complied with the AG's demands except for providing the membership information. This occurred at the height of the Civil Rights movement.

The Supreme Court found the NAACP as a non-profit corporation did not itself have the right to object to the AG's demand, but it had the right to assert its members' rights where they could not assert their rights themselves without giving up those same rights (i.e., identify themselves). See pp. 458-459. So even under this worst case scenario a non-profit would not need CCRs, but could assert its members' rights to protect them and their rights.

See Why Non-Profit Corporations Do Not Have, Deserve or Need Constitutional Rights for more information.

Contrast the preceding hypothetical and unfounded consequences with just a few of the known and highly detrimental consequences of CCRs:

  • Corporate political spending is 1st Amendment "political speech." 
    The result:
    The 2008 Great Recession nearly brought down the U.S. economy, caused in part by corporate political campaign contributions. Shielded as First Amendment-protected “free speech,” that corporate lobbying resulted in repeal of many market protections such as the Glass-Steagall Act. Corporate profits greatly increased but many people lost their homes and retirement savings. Buckley v. Valeo (1976).
  • Corporations have a 1st Amendment right not to speak. 
    The result:
    A federal Court prevented the National Labor Relations Board from ordering businesses to post a rule at the workplace, thus making it more difficult to inform workers of their rights while employers can post anything as long as it does not contain a threat or promise of benefit. National Assoc’n of Manufacturers v. NLRB (2013).

  • Corporations have 4th Amendment protections. 
    The result: Governmental attempts to protect the public from a plethora of dangers stemming from private commercial activities (e.g., food contamination, drug impurities, automobile and airplane defects, dangerous conditions, worker safety violations, and environmental hazards) are thwarted by eliminating surprise inspections. Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc. (1978).

  • Corporations have 5th Amendment protections. 
    The result:
     Certain regulations enacted by a State against corporations are “regulatory takings” and illegal without just compensation -- not instances of legitimate examples of using its police power to protect public health, safety and welfare. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1922).

Corporations have a legal mandate to maximize profit for shareholders. It is our elected official’s responsibility to protect the economy, the environment and the public. Public welfare requires us to reign in unchecked corporations that have hijacked the Constitution and our legal system which has made it impossible to hold them legally responsible without an amendment to the Constitution to make clear that their proper place is accountable to the government and the people.

Move to Amend believes the real danger that desperately requires redress are the actual, known consequences of CCRs wrought by large and wealthy corporations. In fact, we have a bigger problem if we do not act to curtail corporate power.

As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote: “We must make our choice.  We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of the few, but we can’t have both.”


➤➤ PDF: Myths of Harmful “Unintended Consequences” of Abolishing Corporate Personhood

 


Volunteer Sign the Motion to Amend Donate

Connect

You can join us using

Pulse

  • Todd Wolgamuth
  • Brad K
  • Anna Loudenback
  • Laila9654
  • Barbara Lucca
  • SocialistaMaestra
  • Andy B. Carter
  • Titilayo Idayat
  • The Compassionate Dude
  • Clint Nathan

Todd Wolgamuth just joined.

Move2Amend
Follow @MoveToAmend on Twitter

MTA Coalition
About Move to Amend
Local Move to Amend Groups
Issue/Sector Caucuses
Endorsing Organizations
National Staff
Board of Directors
Contact Us

Campaign News
Announcements
Upcoming Events

Amendment
We the People Amendment
Other Amendments

Get Involved
Volunteer
Share the Petition
MTA Action Campaigns
Internship Program

 

 

Learn More
Recommended Resources
Take Action Toolkit
Examples of Corporate Rule
Legalize Democracy Intro Video
Movement Education Program
REAL Democracy History Calendar

Spread the Word

Online Store

En Español
Resources in Spanish

Donate
Make a Donation
Planned Giving
Donor Support Page

Search MoveToAmend.org

 

 

 

Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the people, not corporate interests. We call for an amendment to the US Constitution to unequivocally state that inalienable rights belong to human beings only, and that money is not a form of protected free speech under the First Amendment and can be regulated in political campaigns.

Move to Amend
PO Box 188617 Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 318-8040
Contact Us

Affiliate Admin Login

© Move to Amend

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Move to Amend

  • Campaign News
  • About
  • We the People Amendment
  • Get Involved
  • Learn More
  • Spread the Word
  • Online Store
  • En Español
  • Search

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.

Created with NationBuilder – Theme by Tectonica